![]() ![]() We require seeing data once per 30 days so that we can check both: 1) our backup of your data for errors 2) to make sure that there is no additional data on that drive ). We can definitely saturate networks though, so make sure you're still able to like, stream Netflix and stuff while the backups are occurring. It's mostly intended just to give a quick general indication of how quickly you're uploading. That calculation is pretty rudimentary, basically we're testing a random thread for speed and then multiplying by the available threads selected. Yev from Backblaze here -> I can weigh in a bit on why you may be seeing a super high upload speed in the speedtest within the Backblaze app. So, what are your opinions on the two programs? I don't mind paying the extra money for and waiting the extra time for uploading with Crashplan if it's a better investment, but if no one thinks it's that superior, I'll just go with Backblaze. Right now, Backblaze is winning me over with its upload speeds (and its cheaper price), but I guess none of that matters if it ends up being inferior when it comes to things like security, customer service, and most importantly, restores. I want to make the right choice once the trials are over. However, I'm not sure how accurate this is - how could I have a file uploaded at 188 Mbps when my upload speed shown through speed tests is 1/3 of that at most?Īnyway, I would like to know anyone's experiences with these two programs in the long run. It says I'm averaging 419 GB a day, which is amazing for someone like me with 1.5 TB of files (3-4 days to upload everything, where as Crash Plan has only uploaded 48 GB in the last 16 hours). Now the "last file transfer speed" is showing 20 Mbps at a minimum, and I've seen it go as high as 188 Mbps! (I would say most of the ones I see hover around 100 Mbps). ![]() But then I set the manual throttle to max, and set the number of backup threads to 10. With the default settings, I was getting similar results to Crashplan. It shows you the "last file transfer speed". So, then I downloaded the free trial of Backblaze to compare. It just seemed like it was a really low fraction of my actual upload speed (speed tests show 30-60 Mbps). I even have it set up to use up to 100% of the CPU. but I am only getting between 500 Kbps and a max of around 10 Mbps upload speed. I downloaded the free trial of Crashplan, expecting great results. Crashplan seemed to be the favorite, and I particularly liked it because it has unlimited file retention - I could not have to have my external hard drives connected, and it would still save a copy of the files (Backblaze only keeps them for 30 days). Does anyone have experience with Crashplan and/or Backblaze on a Mac? Preferably someone who has tried both, but input from either side would be appreciated. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |